Logo Ronquido y Apneas

    We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze traffic. Do you give us permission?

    All guides

    DISE before the oral appliance: will a MAD work for me?

    Medically reviewed by Dr. Iván Méndez-Benegassi Silva · ENT & Sleep Medicine Specialist · HM Hospitales, Madrid · License No. 282855946

    Last reviewed:
    SAM titratable mandibular advancement simulator used during DISE to predict the oral appliance response

    The mandibular advancement device (MAD) is an excellent treatment for snoring and mild-to-moderate apnea — but it does not work for everyone, and a custom appliance is an investment. The question is: how do we know if it will work for YOU before you pay for it? The answer is a sleep endoscopy with an advancement simulation.

    What the DISE answers

    The drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) lets us reproduce your sleep and, crucially, simulate the forward movement of the jaw that the MAD produces. We literally watch whether your airway opens with that movement.

    We do this with a titratable Mandibular Advancement Selector (SAM) following the DISE-SAM protocol — an objective, measurable method. You can read the technical detail on the mandibular advancement device.

    How it works, step by step

    Light, controlled sedation

    We reproduce natural sleep in the operating room — no intubation, you wake up within minutes.

    We watch the airway live

    A flexible camera shows the exact site and pattern of collapse while you "sleep".

    Jaw-advancement simulation

    We hold the lower jaw forward with a titratable mandibular advancement selector (SAM), in measurable millimetric steps (the DISE-SAM protocol), and watch whether the airway opens on screen.

    Evidence-based decision

    If the airway opens with advancement, a MAD is very likely to work for you. If it does not, we avoid an appliance that would fail.

    Why not just try the appliance?

    A pharmacy "boil-and-bite" appliance is bulky, can harm the jaw joint and — lacking millimetric adjustment — tends to unseat during the night and stop working, and over time it can shift the teeth in unwanted ways. A custom MAD takes weeks and money. Above all, fitting one without knowing the collapse pattern is treating blind: the most common reasons a device fails are poor adaptation, lateral collapse of the oropharyngeal walls, and trapdoor-type epiglottic collapse — not problems the appliance solves.

    It is not only about severity — the collapse pattern decides

    A MAD is not indicated by your apnea severity alone (mild-to-moderate, or severe if you cannot tolerate CPAP). It also depends on WHERE and HOW the airway closes. The DISE classifies that pattern, and the pattern predicts whether the appliance will respond:

    Patterns that respond well

    • Tongue-base collapse closing front-to-back (anteroposterior): the best predictor — close to four times more likely to respond.
    • Anteroposterior collapse of the soft palate.
    • Mild (grade 1) epiglottic collapse.
    • Partial, not complete, collapses.

    Patterns where the MAD may fail or worsen it

    • Complete concentric collapse of the palate (the airway closes like a ring): predicts worsening — over five times the risk.
    • Complete side-to-side collapse of the pharyngeal walls: the strongest predictor of worsening — over six times the risk.
    • Complete (grade 2) epiglottic collapse.

    This is why the advancement simulation does not just check "does it open?" but also which pattern you have — that is what separates a MAD that works from one that disappoints.

    If the simulation shows the MAD will not be enough, that is valuable information too: we move to the right option, comparing it in our CPAP vs appliance vs surgery guide, or in the CPAP alternatives guide.

    Considering an oral appliance? Make the decision with evidence, not guesswork.

    The titratable mandibular positioner (SAM) versus the manual jaw thrust

    Not all advancement simulations are equal. The classic way is to push the jaw forward by hand during the endoscopy — quick, but impossible to measure or repeat. The titratable mandibular positioner (SAM, Mandibular Advancement Selector) turns that maneuver into an exact, reproducible measurement, which is the foundation of the DISE-SAM protocol.

    Titratable positioner (SAM)

    • Exact advancement in millimetres (−20 to +20 mm).
    • Measurable and reproducible — repeatable by anyone.
    • Objective recommendation (DISE-SAM protocol).
    • Identifies the minimum effective advancement for you.

    Manual jaw thrust

    • Approximate push, not measured.
    • Depends on the examiner — hard to repeat.
    • Subjective, examiner-dependent result.
    • No exact figure for the appliance.

    Frequently asked questions

    What is the titratable mandibular positioner (SAM)?

    It is a positioner placed during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) that advances the lower jaw in millimetric, measurable and reproducible steps (from −20 to +20 mm). It lets us see, level by level, how much advancement is needed to open your airway and whether the oral appliance will work for you. It is the basis of the DISE-SAM protocol.

    How is it different from the traditional manual jaw thrust?

    Pushing the jaw forward by hand during the endoscopy is neither measurable nor reproducible and depends on the examiner. The SAM gives an exact advancement figure and removes that bias, so the recommendation is objective and repeatable.

    Does it work even if my apnea is severe?

    Yes. In the validation study the appliance recommendation did not depend on severity: 64.8% of patients with severe apnea could still benefit, because what matters is whether your collapse responds to advancement, not the AHI figure.

    References

    • Fernández-Sanjuán P, et al. Optimizing Mandibular Advancement Maneuvers during Sleep Endoscopy with a Titratable Positioner: DISE-SAM Protocol. J Clin Med. 2022;11(3):658. doi:10.3390/jcm11030658. (Mandibular advancement device recommended in 73.9% of 161 patients, independently of apnea severity. 2020 Clinical Research Award, American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine.)
    • Veugen CCAFM, et al. The predictive value of mandibular advancement maneuvers during drug-induced sleep endoscopy for treatment success of oral appliance treatment: a prospective study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024. (A positive jaw-thrust maneuver predicts a good appliance response; persistent lateral oropharyngeal collapse predicts a poor one.)
    • Cebola P, et al. Computed tomography versus sleep endoscopy (DISE) to predict the effectiveness of mandibular advancement devices in adults with OSA: a systematic review. PLOS One. 2025. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0327974.